<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metaphor, fundamentalism and the interpretation of life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/</link>
	<description>poetry, politics, reason, morality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:30:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: luaphacim</title>
		<link>http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4237</link>
		<dc:creator>luaphacim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4237</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no Frenchie, but I think &quot;pute&quot; (a shortening of &quot;putain&quot;) would be a fairly good approximation to &quot;bitch&quot; in English. This form is a cognate with the Spanish &quot;puta,&quot; which is also semantically very close to &quot;bitch.&quot; The only major difference in this semantic cluster is that &quot;pute&quot; and &quot;puta&quot; also have strong connotations of prostitution, and although &quot;bitch&quot; can have that meaning as well, it is not a prototypical one.

On the topic of metaphors, have you read George Lakoff and Mark Johnson&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Metaphor&lt;/i&gt;? They would agree that we use metaphor to organize the world, and they even go so far as to suggest that metaphor is what &lt;i&gt;enables&lt;/i&gt; human cognition at all. For a similar approach with more examples and applications for linguistics, check out Zoltan Kovecses&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Metaphor: A Practical Introduction&lt;/i&gt;. 

My two cents: just as it is important not to let fundamentalism trump empirical evidence, I think it&#039;s equally important not to engage in wholesale iconoclasm without careful consideration. The fact that we have the &lt;i&gt;capability&lt;/i&gt; to come up with complex, cohesive systems does not necessarily mean that we &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; cosntructed every such system. And specifically, I hold out a lot of hope that some such systems have origins outside of both us and the natural universe.

Finally, I would also ask (with my tongue halfway into my cheek) whether the ability to construct metaphorical systems could be part of our heritage as beings created in God&#039;s image (if that is in fact the case). And yes, I realize that this idea could very well depend rather heavily on circular logic. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no Frenchie, but I think &#8220;pute&#8221; (a shortening of &#8220;putain&#8221;) would be a fairly good approximation to &#8220;bitch&#8221; in English. This form is a cognate with the Spanish &#8220;puta,&#8221; which is also semantically very close to &#8220;bitch.&#8221; The only major difference in this semantic cluster is that &#8220;pute&#8221; and &#8220;puta&#8221; also have strong connotations of prostitution, and although &#8220;bitch&#8221; can have that meaning as well, it is not a prototypical one.</p>
<p>On the topic of metaphors, have you read George Lakoff and Mark Johnson&#8217;s <i>Metaphor</i>? They would agree that we use metaphor to organize the world, and they even go so far as to suggest that metaphor is what <i>enables</i> human cognition at all. For a similar approach with more examples and applications for linguistics, check out Zoltan Kovecses&#8217;s <i>Metaphor: A Practical Introduction</i>. </p>
<p>My two cents: just as it is important not to let fundamentalism trump empirical evidence, I think it&#8217;s equally important not to engage in wholesale iconoclasm without careful consideration. The fact that we have the <i>capability</i> to come up with complex, cohesive systems does not necessarily mean that we <i>have</i> cosntructed every such system. And specifically, I hold out a lot of hope that some such systems have origins outside of both us and the natural universe.</p>
<p>Finally, I would also ask (with my tongue halfway into my cheek) whether the ability to construct metaphorical systems could be part of our heritage as beings created in God&#8217;s image (if that is in fact the case). And yes, I realize that this idea could very well depend rather heavily on circular logic. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Switzerland is Impossible &#171; Digital Reason</title>
		<link>http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Switzerland is Impossible &#171; Digital Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>[...] moment, so I&#8217;m going to jot down a post on a topic I feel is of great importance. A unique post was recently written by Evil Bender, one of my favorite atheist bloggers. He states &#8220;Humans, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] moment, so I&#8217;m going to jot down a post on a topic I feel is of great importance. A unique post was recently written by Evil Bender, one of my favorite atheist bloggers. He states &#8220;Humans, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lizard Queen</title>
		<link>http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lizard Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4222</guid>
		<description>Nicely put; I enjoyed reading it.

Incidentally, I see the rabbit on the moon... wonder what that says about me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely put; I enjoyed reading it.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I see the rabbit on the moon&#8230; wonder what that says about me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poppies</title>
		<link>http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4218</link>
		<dc:creator>poppies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilbender.wordpress.com/2007/03/17/metaphor-fundamentalism-and-the-interpretation-of-life/#comment-4218</guid>
		<description>That was an eloquent, fascinating post EB.  You&#039;ve made me think about metaphors and fundamentalism in ways I haven&#039;t before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an eloquent, fascinating post EB.  You&#8217;ve made me think about metaphors and fundamentalism in ways I haven&#8217;t before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
